2.437 Bajaj and Anbazhagan (2018)

• Ground-motion model is⁵⁵:
  
  where PGA is in g, a₁ = 5.391 ± 0.28, a₂ = 0.121 ± 0.01, a₃ = 0.356 ± 0.025, a₄ = -0.465 ± 0.008, a₅ = 0.056±0.01, a₆ = -0.007±0.0, a₇ = -0.013±0.0, M_h = 6.5, R_h = 300, M_max = 8, τ = 0.52±0.063 (inter-event) and σ = 0.81 ± 0.036 (total).
• Data from rock and soil sites but do not include site terms in model because of lack of data.
• Data from Indian Himalaya taken from PESMOS, Virtual Data Centre (VDC) and Indian and GNSS network (ISGN).
• Data from VDC baseline corrected and bandpass filtered between 0.75–0.9 and 25–27Hz. Data from PESMOS and ISGN bandpass filtered with cut-offs of 0.1 and 25Hz using 4th order Butterworth filter.
• Reject data from M_w < 5 and > 200km because of low signal-to-noise ratios.
• Use r_hypo because insufficient information on rupture planes.
• Use Monte Carlo method to estimate standard errors in coefficients.
• Choose functional form through residual analysis of previously-published models.